Product

The World’s Largest Wind Turbine Manufacturers in 2026

By Peter Brown, Business Analyst
The World’s Largest Wind Turbine Manufacturers in 2026
On This Page

Looking for the data?

Explore our renewable-energy company datasets and contact databases.

Explore databases

Global wind additions hit an estimated 130 GW in 2025, the second straight year of record deployment, as countries push onshore and offshore build‑out to secure energy supply and meet decarbonisation targets. The turbine manufacturers behind this expansion have collectively crossed the 1 TW milestone. The ten largest wind turbine OEMs by cumulative installed capacity in 2026 are detailed below.

Ranking Methodology

Why cumulative installed capacity?

A manufacturer’s total grid‑connected fleet reveals long‑term track record, fleet reliability and the scale of its service infrastructure. While annual deployment shows current commercial momentum, cumulative gigawatts help developers assess whether a turbine manufacturer has operated in a given market long enough to support a project over its 20‑ to 30‑year life.

Data sources and limitations

The ranking is based on cumulative installed wind turbine capacity (GW) as of Q4 2026, sourced from BloombergNEF, the Global Wind Energy Council (GWEC) and audited company filings. Where possible, we cross‑reference with 2025 annual turbine deployments and disclosed order backlogs. Only wind turbine OEMs are considered; gas‑ or steam‑turbine manufacturers are excluded.

One important nuance: GWEC figures measure grid‑connected capacity, not shipments. That means a manufacturer with a large delivery backlog may look smaller in a pure annual table even if its sales pipeline is strong. We therefore show 2025 deployment data alongside cumulative totals so you can see both installed base and current velocity.

Top 10 Wind Turbine Manufacturers in 2026

1. Vestas

Vestas, headquartered in Aarhus, Denmark and tracing its roots to 1945, holds the industry’s largest installed base at more than 100 GW. In 2025 the company captured a 19% share of onshore turbine deployments globally, driven by strong order intake from North America and EMEA. Its EnVentus platform, engineered for medium‑ to high‑wind onshore sites, anchored much of that growth. Vestas turbines are now running in 88 countries.

2. Siemens Gamesa

Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy emerged from the 2017 merger of Siemens Wind Power and Gamesa and has since surpassed 100 GW installed across onshore and offshore. The company leads the offshore wind segment; its SG 14‑236 DD turbine uses a direct‑drive permanent‑magnet generator and a 236‑metre rotor, a design that cuts mechanical complexity for offshore operations. The turbine is already spinning at major projects such as the 1.4 GW Hornsea 3 off the UK coast. Offices are split between Zamudio, Spain, and Hamburg, Germany.

3. Goldwind

Goldwind Science & Technology, founded in Beijing in 1998, claims more than 110 GW of cumulative installations—the largest onshore‑focused fleet. In 2025 the company deployed over 18 GW, almost entirely within China. International ambitions are taking shape: Goldwind commissioned its first large project in Brazil and holds a pipeline exceeding 2 GW across Latin America and Africa.

4. GE Vernova

GE Vernova became an independent energy business in 2024, carrying a global installed base of more than 55 GW. From its Cambridge, Massachusetts base, the company dominates the onshore wind market in North America. Its Haliade‑X offshore turbine, rated at 14.7 MW with a 220‑metre rotor, secured multi‑GW orders in 2025, including a 2.5 GW US East Coast framework. The turbine order backlog reached 18 GW by year‑end.

5. Envision Energy

Shanghai‑based Envision Energy, founded in 2007, has built over 60 GW of installed capacity, adding more than 10 GW in 2025. The company differentiates itself through AI‑driven fleet optimisation, using digital twins and predictive maintenance to lift energy yield. International growth is accelerating: a 1.4 GW framework in Spain and a 500 MW offshore award in Vietnam have pushed its overseas pipeline past 3 GW.

6. Nordex Group

Nordex Group, the German OEM that merged with Acciona Windpower in 2016, operates from Hamburg and has installed more than 40 GW in over 40 countries. It specialises in onshore machines for complex terrain and moderate‑wind sites. The Delta4000 series, designed for IEC wind class III conditions, reaches 6 MW and has proven especially popular in Latin America. In 2025, Nordex secured 700 MW in Colombia and 400 MW in Chile.

7. Mingyang Smart Energy

Mingyang Smart Energy, founded in Zhongshan, China, in 2006, has surpassed 30 GW installed with a strong offshore focus. Its MySE 16.0‑242 turbine, featuring a 242‑metre rotor and a permanent‑magnet generator, became the world’s largest operating turbine at 16 MW in 2025. The company is now looking toward Europe, winning a turbine supply deal for a floating offshore demonstrator in Scotland.

8. Windey

Zhejiang Windey, a state‑owned manufacturer established in Hangzhou in 2001, has delivered over 40 GW. The company booked 5 GW of new orders in 2025, and its backlog climbed above 12 GW by year‑end—putting it on track to rank among China’s top three wind‑turbine exporters by 2027.

9. Shanghai Electric Wind Power

A division of Shanghai Electric Group active since 2006, Shanghai Electric Wind Power has installed more than 30 GW globally. Its focus is offshore wind and low‑wind‑speed onshore technology. In 2025 the company supplied turbines for China’s first deep‑sea floating wind project, using an 8 MW floating platform. The offshore order backlog stood at 4.5 GW, concentrated in China and Southeast Asia.

10. CSSC Haizhuang Wind Power

CSSC Haizhuang Wind Power, part of China State Shipbuilding Corporation and founded in 2004, has commissioned over 20 GW from its Chongqing base. The company specialises in offshore turbines and hybrid wind‑marine systems. A 1.2 GW offshore framework with Vietnam and a 500 MW onshore deal in Pakistan helped lift its Asia‑Pacific order backlog past 6 GW by end‑2025.

Comparison Table

A quick‑reference overview of the top ten turbine manufacturers by location, founding year, cumulative installed capacity and primary turbine type.

Rank Manufacturer Headquarters Founded Installed Capacity (GW) Primary Turbine Type
1 Vestas Aarhus, Denmark 1945 >100 Onshore/Offshore
2 Siemens Gamesa Zamudio (Spain) / Hamburg (Germany) 2017 (merger) >100 Offshore/Onshore
3 Goldwind Beijing, China 1998 >110 Onshore
4 GE Vernova Cambridge, MA, USA 2024 (spin‑off) >55 Onshore/Offshore
5 Envision Energy Shanghai, China 2007 >60 Onshore/Offshore
6 Nordex Group Hamburg, Germany 2016 (merger) >40 Onshore
7 Mingyang Smart Energy Zhongshan, China 2006 >30 Offshore
8 Windey Hangzhou, China 2001 >40 Onshore/Offshore
9 Shanghai Electric Wind Power Shanghai, China 2006 >30 Offshore/Onshore
10 CSSC Haizhuang Wind Power Chongqing, China 2004 >20 Offshore/Onshore

How to Choose the Right Turbine Manufacturers?

Selecting the right turbine manufacturers is a multi‑year commitment that goes far beyond a ranking table. The decision shapes energy yield, maintenance costs and project bankability. Below, we unpack the key factors and provide a practical checklist.

Onshore vs. offshore priorities

Scenario: Suppose you are developing a 150 MW onshore wind farm in a region where hub‑height wind speeds average 6.5 m/s. If you choose a turbine designed for high‑wind sites, you will leave significant production on the table. Instead, you would look for a turbine manufacturer with a strong track record in IEC Class III (low‑wind) machines, such as the Nordex Delta4000 series or certain Vestas EnVentus variants.

Decision rule: If the site’s mean wind speed is below 7.5 m/s, start with manufacturers that offer large rotors relative to generator size—this maximises capacity factor in low‑wind areas. For high‑wind sites above 8.5 m/s, prioritise robust drivetrain designs and field‑proven reliability under fatigue loads.

Service, O&M and warranty realities

A frequent mistake is fixating on upfront turbine price per megawatt while ignoring long‑term O&M costs and availability guarantees. Even a 5% difference in availability can swing lifetime energy output and revenue by millions. Always ask how the service agreement defines availability, what response times are guaranteed, and whether performance warranties are backed by meaningful liquidated damages.

Expert nuance: A manufacturer may have a large global installed base but limited local service infrastructure in your project’s country. Several Chinese turbine manufacturers, for example, are expanding rapidly into Latin America and Africa, yet their O&M networks are still maturing. Factor in logistics, spare parts inventory and the availability of trained technicians before committing.

A practical checklist for evaluating turbine manufacturers

Use the table below when shortlisting turbine manufacturers for a wind project. It captures the criteria that matter most beyond headline capacity.

Criterion Key Question Why It Matters
Track record How many turbines of the same model/rating are in operation? Proven reliability reduces technical risk and insurance costs.
Technology fit Is the turbine designed for your site’s wind class and climate? A mismatched wind class leads to lower energy yield and higher mechanical stress.
Service & O&M What is the scope of the service agreement and guaranteed availability? O&M can account for 20–25% of total cost of energy over 25 years.
Local supply chain Does the manufacturer have local assembly, crane partners and spare parts? Local content can satisfy permitting rules and shorten downtime.
Financial health Is the OEM profitable and backed by a stable parent? Warranties span 20+ years; you need a counterpart that will still exist.
Warranty & guarantees What performance guarantees and defect-liability periods are offered? Strong warranties protect against early failures and performance shortfalls.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which are the top turbine manufacturers globally in 2026?
The top ten turbine manufacturers by cumulative installed capacity are Vestas, Siemens Gamesa, Goldwind, GE Vernova, Envision Energy, Nordex Group, Mingyang Smart Energy, Windey, Shanghai Electric Wind Power and CSSC Haizhuang Wind Power. Vestas, Siemens Gamesa and Goldwind each surpass 100 GW installed, together accounting for more than half of the global onshore fleet and the bulk of offshore installations.

Who makes wind turbines in the United States?
GE Vernova is the principal US‑based turbine manufacturer, with over 55 GW installed worldwide and a strong onshore presence in North America. Vestas and Siemens Gamesa also run sizeable US manufacturing and assembly operations, supplying turbines from domestic factories.

What are the main types of wind turbines?
Wind turbines fall into onshore and offshore categories, with floating offshore now an emerging sub‑type. Onshore units typically span 2 MW to 7 MW, while offshore turbines have reached 16 MW and use larger rotor diameters to capture more wind at sea. Floating platforms allow deployment in deeper waters where fixed foundations aren’t viable.

What trends are shaping the wind turbine industry in 2026?
Four major trends stand out: offshore turbines scaling to 16 MW and beyond, Chinese manufacturers expanding internationally, AI‑driven digitalisation and predictive maintenance across fleets, and repowering of older onshore farms with more efficient models. These shifts are reshaping competitive dynamics and cost structures across the sector.

How was this ranking compiled?
The ranking is based on cumulative installed wind turbine capacity in GW as of Q4 2026, using data from BloombergNEF, the Global Wind Energy Council and audited company filings. It is supplemented with 2025 annual deployment figures and order backlogs to reflect recent momentum. Only wind turbine OEMs are included; gas and steam turbine manufacturers are excluded.

Download the Full List

What the full dataset includes

Beyond the top‑10 summary, the downloadable list covers regional order intake (GW), active project pipelines, flagship turbine platforms, ownership structures and key O&M service models. Each manufacturer entry carries 30+ data points, updated quarterly to keep pace with the fast‑moving turbine manufacturer landscape.

How developers and investors use it

Wind project developers use this dataset to shortlist turbine suppliers for RFPs, compare platform specifications against site wind conditions, and evaluate supply chain risk. Financial analysts track market share shifts and backlog trends to gauge revenue visibility and manufacturer competitiveness.

Download the full list (free, no registration required) to get the complete dataset with 30+ data points per manufacturer.